The Soapbox

Stimp

Joined: 10/15/1998 Posts: 2185
Likes: 2020


Question for lawyers (including wannabes if you care to play)


I'll cede ideological opposition is the ultimate driver here.

But what is fairly allowing these challenges appears to this correspondent to be crappy crafting of the bill. Seems being thoughtful about the what-ifs, and plain English to account, would have prevented many of these challenges.

Is that just stating the obvious or is that an off-base read?

(In response to this post by ESHooFan)

Posted: 05/12/2016 at 3:07PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Fortunately it will go to D.C. Court of Appeals -- DanTheFan 05/12/2016 3:21PM
  This case was settled long ago in Abbot v Costello ** -- HokieDan95 05/12/2016 4:37PM
  You live in a pleasant bubble then. -- DanTheFan 05/12/2016 6:44PM
  Weak sauce....that the best you can do class warfare -- TomKazanski 05/12/2016 4:55PM
  There is little question it was done poorly -- AlexHoo 05/12/2016 3:40PM
  "You have to pass it to see what's (wrong) in it" ** -- Tuckahokie 05/12/2016 3:46PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307