decision addresses the fact that a presidential record can be improperly classified by a president as personal and that NARA can in its discretion take action to have such a document returned to it. Reread page 22 of the court’s decision, linked below, because you obviously didn’t understand it when you read it before. It directly contradicts your claim that a document automatically becomes personal just because a president takes it home. Furthermore, national defense information, which Trump is charged with illegally possessing, can by no reasonable definition be considered personal. In any event, since Trump has NOT been charged with a violation of the Presidential Records Act, the Clinton Socks decision is completely irrelevant to Trump’s indictment because the lawsuit was entirely about whether the tapes in question were presidential or personal records under the PRA. There is no evidence Trump even made such a distinction when he took the documents to Mar-a-Lago, although it would be irrelevant if there were because the PRA is not at issue in his indictment.

As is usually the result when you “do your own research” you have come to a completely false conclusion here. I have no doubt you believe it, but it’s fantasy invented solely to justify your support of a criminal and pretend that support doesn’t make you and anyone who votes for him complicit.


[Post edited by SixerHoo at 01/17/2024 4:46PM]