The Soapbox

Joined: 03/05/2014 Posts: 19744
Likes: 30347

What's this?

Have you read the Clinton case decision? There is no point in...

...continuing this conversation if you are going to remain willfully ignorant, so let me know. If you have read it, my next question to you is going to be for you tell me what it says regarding these matters, all of which it addresses.

As an aside, SCOTUS only gets involved in cases brought before it. They don't just go out scavenging for laws to strike down on their own. This law has never been brought before it, primarily because no DOJ has ever sought to misinterpret and abuse it in the way in which the Biden DOJ is currently to persecute a political rival.

(In response to this post by SixerHoo)

Posted: 01/17/2024 at 3:05PM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

I guess desperate times call for desperate measures. -- HowieT3 01/17/2024 09:22AM

They're right, the intelligence community was biased against Trump -- WahooKid 01/17/2024 10:35AM

Bingo! ** -- 111Balz 01/17/2024 10:37AM

A president is not allowed to take any documents when he leaves office, -- 111Balz 01/17/2024 10:03AM

How about a Corvette owning Veep? ** -- Hoodafan 01/17/2024 11:32AM

When the documents were found, he immediately turned them in. No resistance ** -- 111Balz 01/17/2024 11:49AM

So which is it? -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 11:41AM

Dishonest. He's thrown off any semblance of the veneer of ... -- HowieT3 01/17/2024 11:47AM

One could do it. One definitely couldn't. Not hard to understand the -- Hoodafan 01/17/2024 11:45AM

It’s actually very easy to understand the difference. One took -- 111Balz 01/17/2024 11:57AM

No, the law says that all the documents belong to the government. -- HowieT3 01/17/2024 11:51AM

The "law" does not say that, and the "law" you are referring to... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 12:01PM

Try again. Relevant portions of 44 USC Chapter 22 quoted -- HowieT3 01/17/2024 2:21PM

I'm fully aware of all this. What you miss is that... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 2:46PM

You conveniently ignore the fact that the Clinton Socks -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 4:32PM

NARA cannot "take action to have such a document returned to it" because... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 5:10PM

Wrong. So very, sadly wrong. -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 5:19PM

Whoever told you Trump had the right to take whatever he wanted is not -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 1:17PM

Sorry, you're wrong. I suggest that... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 1:22PM

Yes, yes, yes, we know you believe that case proves your point. -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 1:28PM

And as that case decision will explain to you, Congress cannot... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 1:47PM

BTW, Congress did make such a law in 1978, the Presidential Records Act, -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 2:19PM

Have you read the Clinton case decision? There is no point in... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 3:05PM

And here is a piece that will explain to you the difference between -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 2:12PM

Why would I need to "read a piece" about the PRA legislation when... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 3:09PM

And the answer to your question is that the author has a far stronger -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 4:52PM

The question is why do you make false claims about it? -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 3:23PM

Have you read it? Yes or no? ** -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 4:07PM

Yes. See my response at 4:32 to your post at 2:46. -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 4:34PM

Uh-huh, sure. Well, I have actually read it, and... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 4:56PM

Meanwhile, ponder what the words “during his time in office” mean. -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 5:07PM

I have. When Trump (or any president) had... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 5:15PM

They have discretion *within the law.* The PRA clearly defines what -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 5:39PM

That's simply false, as the Clinton case -- and Constitution --... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 6:36PM

I said I would respond to you further today. After reviewing our exchange -- SixerHoo 01/18/2024 08:18AM

I’ll respond to this tmw. Refuting your insanity has driven me to drink and -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 5:00PM

You're welcome. ** -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 5:17PM

Based on that answer I’m going with “both.” ** -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 11:48AM

The PRA proscribes no criminal penalty for a POTUS -- JMHoo 01/17/2024 10:38AM

How much $s did he get selling our country's secrets? You know he did. ** -- aint2Hokie4me 01/17/2024 11:21AM

Actually, I wouldn't be certain that he did. MAYBE he intended to, I don't -- Late 80s Hokie 01/17/2024 11:58AM

Trump was not charged under PRA -- DanTheFan 01/17/2024 10:49AM

Wow. That sounds so unfair! No other ex president has faced that ** -- 81_Hokie 01/17/2024 11:24AM

I'm well aware. ** -- JMHoo 01/17/2024 10:57AM

The PRA has no authority over the president, as the… -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/17/2024 10:44AM

💩 post ** -- Hoodeac 01/17/2024 1:10PM

Steal “his” files?! ** -- HoodatB 01/17/2024 11:01AM

Delusional nonsense. ** -- SixerHoo 01/17/2024 10:58AM

When Eisenhower was writing his memoir -- NJHoo 01/17/2024 10:10AM

“Judge” Loose Cannon will rule in TFG’s favor. Smith will petition 11th -- WaxHoo 01/17/2024 09:55AM

Nice! ** -- ryno hoo 01/17/2024 09:50AM

Looooo-zer! ** -- HowieT3 01/17/2024 10:13AM

So mistreated. So unfair. It's a disgrace. Aileen is his only hope -- Hoo TV 01/17/2024 09:28AM

Crazy eyes? Check. ** -- TomGlansAski 01/17/2024 10:29AM