The Soapbox

Seattle .Hoo

Joined: 08/13/1998 Posts: 57196
Likes: 76474


That's fair. So two things. First, don't make the argument that the Court


produced its own cultural definitions in Roe, but not in Obergefell. It isn't true in either case. Second, Roe had some other precedents such as Griswold, that hinted at a right to privacy, which the Court finally recognized in Roe, even though that right in the case of abortion was not absolute.

Are you prepared to say that Americans don't have a right to privacy? Because, the Court certainly suggested that in Dobbs.

(In response to this post by CharlestonSC)

Posted: 02/18/2023 at 10:28PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Pass a bill ** -- psychobilly 02/18/2023 5:54PM
  Cruelty for the sake of cruelty. ** -- HoosWillWin 02/18/2023 2:18PM
  The cruelty is the point ** -- Hoo TV 02/18/2023 3:50PM
  See Dobbs. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 02/18/2023 1:52PM
  That’s different conceptually -- CharlestonSC 02/18/2023 2:14PM
  Naive....that's too nice of a word..... ** -- Zhoo 02/18/2023 6:41PM
  It depends which version you read... -- TomGlansAski 02/18/2023 1:17PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307