The Soapbox

CharlestonSC

Joined: 09/20/2006 Posts: 7389
Likes: 6768


I don’t know the term the court uses, but they look to history to establish


If something that may not be written into law was still customary under English/common law. So when looking back at American history the question of was abortion “customarily” legal in such a way as to be culturally accepted. So what I’m saying is that it’s quite circular in logic to allow the court to present a decision, not review the matter for some time, then claim the time that’s elapsed between reviews is itself the cultural precedent.

(In response to this post by Seattle .Hoo)

Posted: 02/18/2023 at 6:06PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Pass a bill ** -- psychobilly 02/18/2023 5:54PM
  Cruelty for the sake of cruelty. ** -- HoosWillWin 02/18/2023 2:18PM
  The cruelty is the point ** -- Hoo TV 02/18/2023 3:50PM
  See Dobbs. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 02/18/2023 1:52PM
  That’s different conceptually -- CharlestonSC 02/18/2023 2:14PM
  Naive....that's too nice of a word..... ** -- Zhoo 02/18/2023 6:41PM
  It depends which version you read... -- TomGlansAski 02/18/2023 1:17PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307