What's the difference between refusing to bake a gay wedding cake and
refusing to serve black people at Lester Maddux's restaurant?
I think I'm getting from your post that your posited distinction is that the baker's free exercise of his religion would have been infringed? Therefore in a place of public accommodation he could refuse to provide a service he provided to heterosexual couples, to a homosexual couple?
Whereas Lester Maddux didn't claim a religious underpinning for his refusal to serve black members of the public?
Would it have made a difference if he had?
|
(
In response to this post by Hoodafan)
Posted: 09/06/2016 at 6:04PM