Do you see why it docent work the same way, both ways though?
there's a difference between being a member of the race, even a personally GUILT-FREE member of the race, which perpetrated slavery followed by second class citizenship for a period in excess of THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY fucking years, and being a member of the "discriminated against" (and "discriminated against" seems to understate it, no?) race?
Such that it's maybe, I dunno, "fair" that they get to "have it both ways" for a few generations?
I mean would a hundred years if "having it both ways", even, be too much, after the 350 years of being "discriminated against?" (Where for the first 250 years, that's 2.5 centuries, "discriminated against" meant "OWNED exactly like a cow or a pig or a horse?")
I don't know, it just seems kind of churlish to be constantly pointing out, "Gee if white people did that, hoo boy would there be hell to pay!"
|
(
In response to this post by Hoodafan)
Posted: 09/06/2016 at 5:48PM