The Soapbox

Hoodafan

Joined: 09/29/2013 Posts: 60868
Likes: 57531


But the principal is the same, regardless of size of the group. And the


argument that you shouldn't force those practices on a private business is the same.

Sorry, I'm just not seeing much defense for the HB2 approach. It's not a right to privacy issue because you're forcing Caitlyn Jenner to be in the bathroom with little boys and a penis-less man to be in the bathroom with little girls - exactly what the HB2 supporters cite as a problem. It doesn't mandate any additional cost on private business, only who they can bar from using a rest room, much like they wanted to do with blacks. You can offer single unisex bathrooms, but you can't force someone to use them anymore than if they were handicap or "colored".

The big problem for both sides as I see it, is neither wants to focus solely on the shower/locker room aspect where people have to/choose to disrobe and have more right to privacy than in a public bathroom with stalls. McCrory, etc. were too stupid or too attention seeking to just make that the focal point so they received the expected outrage. And the LGBT activists are too stupid or too agenda driven to stop at just bathrooms, and want to force this to the shower/locker room level too. If it was just limited to using the genitalia approach for public (as opposed to single changing stalls) showers/locker rooms, I'm pretty sure the overwhelming majority would tell any complainers to just stfu.

(In response to this post by AlexHoo)

Posted: 05/10/2016 at 11:06AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  I don't know, but I am pretty much with NC on this one. -- hoolstoptheheels 05/10/2016 11:14AM
  North Carolina Transgender school house rock -- HokieDan95 05/09/2016 9:11PM
  Real problems are complicated and scary -- Beerman 05/09/2016 8:20PM
  Pretty much ** -- HokieDan95 05/09/2016 9:16PM
  Okay. Why are NC Republicans pushing the issue? -- DanTheFan 05/09/2016 7:43PM
  It is a morality issue to protect the children. ** -- FfxStationHokie 05/09/2016 8:14PM
  I believe the children are our future ** -- 111Balz 05/09/2016 11:23PM
  Not totally on board with that analogy KC. -- hoolstoptheheels 05/10/2016 11:48AM
  So do you, ryno. ** -- Shenhoo 05/10/2016 08:20AM
  Good, we agree KCHoo makes it up. ** -- ryno hoo 05/10/2016 08:45AM
  Which right is that? ** -- TpkeHoo 05/09/2016 8:47PM
  Dick Checks - show 'em if you have 'em ** -- 111Balz 05/09/2016 7:40PM
  Good. Please flash it to reduce pervism. ** -- Shenhoo 05/09/2016 6:43PM
  Can I just show them my hands? ** -- DanTheFan 05/09/2016 6:28PM
  If they are holdng your penis - yes ** -- FfxStationHokie 05/09/2016 6:45PM
  FBI? ** -- Hoos Operator 05/09/2016 6:22PM
  Sorry, DOJ. ** -- WahooRQ 05/09/2016 6:24PM
  Why is it I knew you would go there? ** -- Hoos Operator 05/09/2016 5:18PM
  Yes, but not to the degree this Administration has -- Hoos Operator 05/09/2016 6:09PM
  Deleted (man, I got get rid of this old iPad)** -- Hoos Operator 05/09/2016 9:30PM
  Or not. The stuff people think... ** -- 111Balz 05/09/2016 7:55PM
  Dude, that's absurd ** -- 111Balz 05/09/2016 11:20PM
  Exhibit A... -- Hoos Operator 05/09/2016 11:37PM
  Gee, I wonder why..... ** -- 111Balz 05/10/2016 07:34AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307