Yeah, well at least two problems with that. First the judge was not trying
To prove a claim, the attorney for Trump was. Second, the judges question was not about a scenario opposite from Trump‘s position, but a potential conclusion, result, of Trump’s position.
So your attempt to use a term you clearly don’t understand is pretty sad. A deflection and not a good one.
[Post edited by 111Balz at 02/06/2024 12:15PM]
|
(
In response to this post by Los Angeles Hoo)
Posted: 02/06/2024 at 12:15PM