The Soapbox

Hoodafan

Joined: 09/29/2013 Posts: 60825
Likes: 57459


Oh I saw plenty of stupidity in that article, but it's still exactly what I


describe. Sorry Stuart Rockstarwannabe, you have to pay taxes on those gigs you book regardless of whether they pay you via Venmo or not. And sorry Suzie Dumbasarock you don't have to worry about tracking and paying taxes on that $100 you got for selling your couch, again regardless of whether you get paid by Venmo or not.

But in the end, this is still nothing but a way to generate alternative 1099's, and/or check that those that should've been generated indeed are, so the Feds can grab their share of that (which is not in and of itself a bad thing, I'm not defending paying folks under the table) - the money grab. And increase the workload at the IRS to monitor it (to justify the job bloat there, they're already calling for) - the Govco bloat grab. And as an added bonus not previously mentioned, passing the cost and burden of that onto Venmo which, while it won't "destroy" them, will force them to add or increase fees, and/or reduce costs elsewhere ("destroy" jobs).

And yes, Venmo is disproportionately used by the poor and working class, so they will disproportionately be affected. But again, Dems have never had an issue with regressive taxation. All taxation is a good thing for them.

(In response to this post by HoodatB)

Posted: 01/12/2022 at 2:15PM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Democrats doing their best to destroy venmo -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 12:28PM
  Venmo can’t tell what is commercial or not -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 5:23PM
  So because irs already has crappy policies in place -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 5:50PM
  No you have to be able to account for what’s reported -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 6:20PM
  Have you ever been audited? ** -- SixerHoo 01/12/2022 6:21PM
  Yes -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 6:22PM
  Probably should avoid shady tax claims then. ** -- SixerHoo 01/12/2022 6:24PM
  I remember once they garnished my dads wages -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 6:59PM
  You are so dumb. ** -- HooAskedYou 01/12/2022 1:55PM
  🎣 ** -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 1:59PM
  Well -- Beerman 01/12/2022 3:36PM
  I would agree -- Beerman 01/12/2022 4:13PM
  You know, Hooda... -- Beerman 01/12/2022 4:42PM
  Can you link your data to where -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 2:25PM
  Like dumb and dumber ** -- Hoo TV 01/12/2022 2:04PM
  You mean “the law” right? ** -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 12:45PM
  Yeah, $600 is probably too low, but I love this quote -- BocaHoo91 01/12/2022 12:56PM
  No, another example -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 12:53PM
  Not true. You are so dumb. ** -- HooAskedYou 01/12/2022 1:56PM
  YET AGAIN YOU ARE AN IDIOT… -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 1:34PM
  Again in your link -- TomKazanski 01/12/2022 5:57PM
  ^^^ Ignoramus Kazanskus ^^^ ** -- TomGlansAski 01/12/2022 12:37PM
  You tell em there Scrotum ** -- HokieDan95 01/12/2022 12:44PM
  Let's go Danny! ** -- TomGlansAski 01/12/2022 12:49PM
  Are you defending a person complaining about -- HoodatB 01/12/2022 12:46PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307