But once again you don't address my point. You claimed that
She really did not do anything predecessors did, (I think you really meant she did not do anything her predecessors did not also do) there's no evidence she deliberately mishandled top secret info..
Did ANY of her predecessors have a private server in their basement?
Did ANY of her predecessors email classified information outside of approved procedures?
Did ANY of her predecessors have classified info at home? THIS IS ILLEGAL and it was deliberate. Why do you have such a hard time accepting and admitting that?
Your claims are provably, objectively false yet you insist on making them. Do you really believe them?
|
(
In response to this post by 111Balz)
Posted: 05/06/2016 at 12:16PM