The Soapbox

fishhoo

Joined: 02/27/2004 Posts: 1354
Likes: 2883


I'm sorry -- you are correct -- read it a few times and thought


it was specifically suggesting that failing its background check did not necessarily disqualify an applicant but it was being applied in a disparate way. Seems the meaning is failing this test eliminates all applicants but this is referencing disparate treatment from the test as a primary filter --- if such effect can be shown and it can be argued that some employment evaluation without the same effect may exist.

OK - I admit I still think it would be nice if you posted fewer grievances. But I was wrong with my post. Carry on...

(In response to this post by JMHoo)

Posted: 04/22/2024 at 09:30AM



+2

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  So Trump won't be able to work at Sheetz? ** -- NJHoo 04/22/2024 11:44AM
  ....** -- Tuckahokie 04/22/2024 10:20AM
  Doubling down on dumb again. Read the article. -- 111Balz 04/22/2024 08:01AM
  LOL ** -- ResistHoo 04/22/2024 08:16AM
  Stores are being forced to hire criminals? -- DexterLake 04/21/2024 9:23PM
  Where in the article does it say that? ** -- 111Balz 04/22/2024 08:28AM
  Why do you hate Black perxons?!?!? -- ResistHoo 04/21/2024 10:00PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307