Yes, there are plenty of ways that entities in the places you've listed tried to detect fraud. The GA government had a GOP Secretary of State, Governor, and legislature in 2020. All of them tried to find evidence of fraud and couldn't. The legislature desperately wanted to find it so they could try to change the statewide outcome for Trump, while the Secretary of State did it as part of his job and showed his analysis to Trump's team. The same can be said for legislatures in Michigan, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Of course, that's not actually the kind of detection I was talking about, but it's worth knocking down your false statement.

In regards to your methods, you're throwing stuff at the wall and hoping it sticks. It doesn't. I was actually asking you to put together a coherent method from start to finish, but your wall-slinging list is easy enough to take apart instead.

In order to flip the outcome in Georgia (Dan's example below), you need at least 12k ballots to be fraudulent (likely 2-3x more to be safe). If you steal, buy, or vote in someone else's name, there will be a record of that person having voted. Are you confident that none of the 12k living people who are registered to vote will also want to vote in that election, resulting in them discovering that they had "already voted"? Many of them would have wanted to vote for Trump and have every reason to want to scream to the high heavens that their vote had been stolen. It strains all reason to think that you could perfectly execute that plan at that scale without anybody crying foul. That's not to mention that such a plan would involve dozens or hundreds of people to pull off and not a one of them would be able to spill the beans EVER. Such conspiracies always fall apart under the weight of keeping such a secret.

If you vote in a place of non-residency that will be detected in the post-election audits. If you stuff the ballot box the number of votes won't match the number of people who turned in a ballot and it will be detected in the audit. If you vote in the name of a dead person it will be detected in the same way.

The rest of what you said is conspiratorial nonsense working from the premise that your earlier arguments hold water. Since I've already shown that they don't, I see no reason to address them.

[Post edited by CMUHoo at 03/10/2024 1:47PM]