The Soapbox

Hoodafan

Joined: 09/29/2013 Posts: 60863
Likes: 57514


The whole TX and ID approach is just weird to me, and well above my legal


understanding. IIRC it had something to do with being necessary to survive initial scrutiny (and the article I linked below said ID thinks they can hold up better by making legal challenges easier than TX did), but that all along they were hoping some of the other cases would be the ones to actually make a change in Roe (MO maybe). So it's almost as if they never intended these laws to actually survive.

But in the meantime, even if it's just legal wrangling, I think it's going to hurt them, and probably badly. Even just on the surface, I don't think your average voter is going to think 6 weeks is anywhere close to reasonable, so if they don't even go past that aspect, I have to think a bunch of voters will simply stop at "well I'm not voting for the folks pushing that".

(In response to this post by hoolstoptheheels)

Posted: 03/16/2022 at 5:12PM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  Certifiably insane ** -- HokieJamie 03/16/2022 5:44PM
  Isn't that already the rule in Texas? ** -- HoosWillWin 03/16/2022 5:14PM
  The Taliban says WTF! ** -- 757 03/16/2022 4:39PM
  Let’s see if these vigilante laws survive judicial review. ** -- hoolstoptheheels 03/16/2022 4:31PM
  SCOTUS sez weren’t you watching? ** -- WaxHoo 03/16/2022 5:23PM
  I agree with your last paragraph, but if Roe goes down shortly, -- hoolstoptheheels 03/16/2022 5:05PM
  This SC is not consistent -- Zhoo 03/16/2022 5:22PM
  Texas is predicting the outcome in the Supreme Court? -- hoolstoptheheels 03/16/2022 4:43PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307