…were claiming Trump filed criminally false documents with public officials. I said that he had not and asked you (mostly in jest) to send them to me. Instead, you sent me an excerpt from an indictment filed by Fani Willis, a known perjurer. Now, the fact that Willis is a known perjurer doesn’t prove that she was lying in this particular excerpt, but it’s still an excerpt from her filing, not Trump’s, meaning it doesn’t support your point.

I called you out on that, and you basically told me to fuck off and find it myself, as if it were up to me to prove your case for you when I already know you have no case.

You then came back with a link to another doc — this one filed by Trump — that contained not only zero criminal statements, but apropos of your previous post, contained zero of the statements from Willis that you’d linked in your previous post, leading me to believe you’d mistakenly linked the wrong document.

When I asked you that question, you referred back to Willis’ claim of criminal activity, which is just circular reasoning, and went to bed.

So, yeah, we live in different realities. I live in the one where claims about criminal filings need to be backed up by the actual filings, which have actually to exist. You live in a different reality, I suppose.

You’re a very smart poster, IMO, and I’m happy to engage in good faith with you as I did yesterday, but let’s not pretend that I wasn’t the one accepting reality when I gave you multiple chances to support your claim and you could not.



[Post edited by Los Angeles Hoo at 04/05/2024 09:39AM]