The Soapbox

southdenverhoo

Joined: 10/11/2001 Posts: 13296
Likes: 17891


Oh it says some things, and it also says some things are excluded, see


bottom of page 2 and most of page 3. Question is whether Smith has kept his ongoing actions--the ones Trump has complained of-- within the exclusions the Court has enumerated.

I think he has, and I think Trump's motion is frivolous in part but possibly states a legit objection in part too. I doubt Smith will be held in contempt however.

I mean, among the things Smith has done which Trump objected to is PRODUCE discovery. Not PROPOUND (dumb word that lawyers use for some reason) discovery requests that Trump must answer, but PRODUCE material TO Trump that Smith is required to provide a Defendant under the criminal rules. I think this is frivolous.

(In response to this post by Seattle .Hoo)

Posted: 01/04/2024 at 8:54PM



+2

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  No matter how sleazy one thinks… -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/04/2024 3:50PM
  Pic -- HowieT3 01/04/2024 5:04PM
  Nonsense ** -- 111Balz 01/04/2024 4:30PM
  What Constitutional rights? Please be specific. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 01/04/2024 6:20PM
  Due process. The prosecutor is... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/04/2024 6:34PM
  What court order? Be specific. ** -- Seattle .Hoo 01/04/2024 7:21PM
  The one attached here, which... -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/04/2024 7:51PM
  No, he’s not. ** -- 111Balz 01/04/2024 4:56PM
  Classic. You justify the… -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/04/2024 5:33PM
  You do realize that… -- Los Angeles Hoo 01/04/2024 5:04PM
  You misspelled Trump ** -- WaxHoo 01/04/2024 3:54PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307