makes further dialogue with you on the topic, um, presumptively invalid.

did you know that in Wisconsin the COVID related procedures you decry were announced in the summer, and not objected to by either party, until Trump lost, and THEN objected to them? Did you kowl that there were cases reached on the merits, ie not dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and/or standing, where the Republican majority, elected state Supreme Court and the Republican appointed (one by Trump) Federal 3 judge panel affirmed, found that the unreasonable delay in objecting to the announced procedure meant the petitioners were barred from objecting, at the late date of AFTER the election, from complaining about them?

What this means is the procedures were not, in your words, "illegal." If their "presumptive invalidity" arises only from their "illegality" under your construct, then your construct collapses.