the one about leaking Trump’s tax returns “indisputably” being a felony. That’s not true, and is a perfect example of how you have way too much confidence in what you THINK you know if that belief supports your agenda. I’m linking an article explaining that whoever gave the returns to the NYT MAY have committed a felony but that is not at all certain or “indisputable.” What is certain and indisputable is that the NYT broke no laws in publishing the information regardless of who gave it to them. You might have some credibility if you’d stop asserting things as facts when they are by no means proven to be so. And finally, stop attributing the lack of prosecutions (e.g., of Comey or Wolfe) or evidence to “bias” or the “corrupt system.” What a lazy and intellectually bankrupt way to rationalize buying into the false narratives and lies that are necessary to support your assertions. IG Horowitz specifically found that there was no bias in the actions he investigated. That’s what he found whether you like it or not. Same goes for calling the indictments of the Russians “cover.” That is sheer invention and fantasy in an effort to invalidate the entire Mueller probe.
[Post edited by SixerHoo at 01/31/2021 4:22PM]