bullshit.

I do love that you led with Hillary. Hillary's email thing has nothing to do with efforts to expose Trump now. And it only provides evidence of care not to disrupt Trump's chances in 2016 - since we heard nothing of the Russia investigation until after the voting, and chapter and verse about Hill's server before. You think others are being irrational?

Care to show me an actual admission by any newspaper that they "perpetuated a hoax"? Relating to Russia? That would be impossible, since the Mueller report lays out in great detail that the whole thing is anything but a hoax. On some level, you know that, because you turn to attacking the Mueller investigation as hopelessly partisan. You see, you say the Strzok thing is clearly documented. You know what was very clearly documented? The IG report, which says that while investigators have political views, even strong ones (they are at least as entitled to that as you or I), the conclusions in the email case were not impacted by that. You don't like that conclusion, so it, I guess becomes part of the Deep State. That's how one gets into the Trumpistani Deep State.

But you managed to ignore that, because that's what one does in Trumpistan - the 448 damning Mueller report - it is extremely damning about Trump and many of his associates - is the product of EXTREME DEEP STATE PARTISANS!!! In spite of Mueller's many decades of stellar public service. That gets thrown away, because when Trumpies don't like the message, the messenger better don his body armor.

The whistleblower rule is in place to protect the ability of whistleblowers to come forward with no threat of reprisal. That has to apply to all whistleblowers, and this one was deemed credible by the IG, who has that job (that's not your job). But since it's bad for Trump, the loyal subjects put quotes around whistleblower.

You know why the former director of the CIA made accusations you reference above? Because that's his opinion! You decide they are outrageous because you are devoted to Trump. You're not the arbiter of outrageous, and former public officials speaking their minds is not a conspiracy. Just like in a country with a rule of law, obeying subpoenas is not optional. The duly elected House issued them, and as Trumpies selectively say, elections have consequences.

Your reply is literally gallons of raw sewage spewed into cyberspace, and you think my points are irrational? You judge absolutely every little thing based on whether it is good or bad for Trump. You would be drawing the exact opposite conclusions if this were president Hill, all else being equal. You know that's true.

[Post edited by hoolstoptheheels at 10/14/2019 1:19PM]