I suggest you take closer look at the “evidence” obtained in the Mueller
Report, especially many of the supporting footnotes.
“The more than 2,000 footnotes included in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Trump-Russia collusion allegations are also illuminating. Most of the citations are matter-of-fact support for claims made in the main text. But a close reading reveals that many of the footnotes raise more questions than they answer, especially regarding Mueller’s methods and intent. Some footnotes show that key allegations often rely on the flimsy say-so of media accounts; others show a willingness to accept the claims of anti-Trump critics at face value. Mueller and his team also used the footnotes as the place to include unsubstantiated gossip and speculation.”
|
(
In response to this post by hoolstoptheheels)
Link: The Shaky Standing of Mueller's Footnotes
Posted: 10/14/2019 at 12:48PM