Or maybe the dishonesty narrative has been played so long you are immune to
it. 30 years of breaking the law from Rose law billing and FBI files (you don't really buy that she didn't know anything about them, do you? Do you think the maid had them all the time?) to the latest fiasco with her home server (do you buy "it was easier" and if you do is that an acceptable excuse for stealing the public record? Do you think any future historian could have written a book about her time at State had it not been for this? I don't know if her goal was to keep evidence from the FBI or from History but that makes a whole lot more sense than "I didn't want to carry two phones" Clinton as president would mean another dark ages of lost information or disinformation.
|
(
In response to this post by WahooRQ)
Posted: 02/18/2016 at 3:17PM