You did argue the points because you claimed that...
...a defendant -- in America -- has no right or need to know the specifics charges and laws involved prior to trial, which is absurd, and that's exactly what the author pointed out. Bragg can't specify any crimes because there were no crimes, just FYI. This case is the stupidest one of the bunch, and that is saying something.
|
(
In response to this post by 111Balz)
Posted: 03/25/2024 at 3:54PM