But is income the right metric? If Elon Musk takes a salary of $100 and
his Tesla stock appreciates by $50 Billion what should he pay in taxes? Understanding that his gain is unrealized, his income is not representative of his ability to pay taxes, which I think "income" is a crude attempt to measure.
A wealth tax is not workable but it is a better basis for deciding what is equitable. In my view an equitable tax system would say that accumulated wealth could be expected to return x% per year, realized or not, and a tax rate should be some percentage of that. If those numbers are, say, 6% return and 33% then that's 2% of wealth. I don't think Liz Warren is too far off there. Again, I think the system is unworkable for a multitude of reasons but making comparisons of tax burden based on income misses the mark, I think.
I have posted before and I will again here... I'm ok with a tax on realized gains as long as at death all gains are realized and taxes on that are paid before anything else. No trusts, no generation skipping anything, no charities. Pay your taxes and then do what you want with the remainder.
[Post edited by 81_Hokie at 01/10/2023 6:00PM]
|
(
In response to this post by BocaHoo91)
Posted: 01/10/2023 at 5:57PM