For what? ** -- Seattle .Hoo 04/05/2022 12:11PM Rape, Foreign corrupt practices..... -- MasterRusty 04/06/2022 07:25AM Son of a bitch...... ** -- MasterRusty 04/06/2022 07:14AMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
For what? ** -- Seattle .Hoo 04/05/2022 12:11PM Rape, Foreign corrupt practices..... -- MasterRusty 04/06/2022 07:25AM Son of a bitch...... ** -- MasterRusty 04/06/2022 07:14AM Finally! I was all pins and needles waiting for it. ** -- hoolstoptheheels 04/05/2022 08:27AM Manafort, Flynn, stone ** -- Plano Hoo 04/05/2022 07:50AM Judge sullivan was corrupt -- MasterRusty 04/06/2022 07:22AM None of whom are immediate family members. You missed the point. ** -- Mr Wahoo 04/05/2022 08:09AM Russian Mob Family ** -- Newt 04/05/2022 6:44PM That is weak. They are cronies, and oh, it actually happened rather than -- Plano Hoo 04/05/2022 08:31AM Do you know what ‘immediate family’ is? It’s not through inlaws. ** -- Mr Wahoo 04/05/2022 08:52AM You are comparing things that have actually happened with things that you -- Plano Hoo 04/05/2022 09:39AM Well, extremely political at least, that’s for sure. ** -- hoolstoptheheels 04/05/2022 09:41AM Ok, so your argument seems to be “it’s ok to pardon people close -- hoolstoptheheels 04/05/2022 09:13AM Of course, none of those family members serve in any capacity at all -- hoolstoptheheels 04/05/2022 08:25AM No he didn’t ** -- 111Balz 04/05/2022 08:21AM Yes. He did. Pardoning immediate family members is another level.** -- Mr Wahoo 04/05/2022 08:51AM Nah. And a hypothetical is not the same as something that actually happened ** -- 111Balz 04/05/2022 08:55AM There was a LOT of negative speculation about Trump doing so for -- Mr Wahoo 04/05/2022 08:58AM Oh he undoubtedly would, unless he needed to sacrifice them to -- 111Balz 04/05/2022 09:05AM Will Justice Thomas vote to hide evidence about his wife? -- DanTheFan 04/05/2022 05:21AM Is that a whaddabout of desperation? I'm failing to see how that is at all -- Hoodafan 04/05/2022 08:16AM The difference? Thomas' action is something that happened. -- CobhamHoo 04/05/2022 10:54AM Potentially would be your important word. It was an 8-1 decision. What -- Hoodafan 04/05/2022 11:51AM Dan was pointing out Rusty’s partisan hypocrisy. Look that word up ** -- 111Balz 04/05/2022 09:06AM You fail to see a lot of things. The relevance is obvious to anyone with -- SixerHoo 04/05/2022 08:56AM Evidence of what? ** -- JMHoo 04/05/2022 07:09AM Of lack of judicial integrity in failing to recuse due to appearance of -- hoolstoptheheels 04/05/2022 08:35AM The OP spoke of evidence against GINNI Thomas, not Clarence Thomas. -- JMHoo 04/05/2022 09:29AM Clarence sleeps with Ginni every night. Ginni is all in on -- hoolstoptheheels 04/05/2022 09:37AM It sure seems problematic for a Supreme Court Justice to be sharing their -- hooshouse 04/05/2022 07:31AM Absolutely. A lawyer should not have to ask that question. -- hoolstoptheheels 04/05/2022 08:38AM No integrity left. ** -- Lazarus 04/05/2022 05:46AM