I’m certainly not a lawyer, much less a judge, but that

seems to me to be lacking in logic. If she had known her share was worth more, she would have negotiated on that basis and probably still would have signed for some larger amount eventually. Whatevs, as my daughter says.
[Post edited by SixerHoo at 07/03/2020 12:59PM]

In response to this post by WahooMatt05

Posted: 07/03/2020 at 12:53PM

Mary Trump accuses her family of committing fraud against her -- WahooMatt05 07/03/2020 12:06PM

Not sure why she would not have signed if she knew the assets -- SixerHoo 07/03/2020 12:30PM

She was paid $X to not talk based on Trump claiming only $40M in assets -- WahooMatt05 07/03/2020 12:36PM

Yeah, that’s what I’m reading too. But if she signed the agreement for $X, -- SixerHoo 07/03/2020 12:41PM

Its probably a fraudulent inducement claim, but may also depend upon -- Plano Hoo 07/03/2020 1:03PM

She was given a fixed amount of money, not participation in family wealth -- RickPerry 07/03/2020 12:49PM

Well that’s exactly her argument. She should’ve been paid ten times more -- WahooMatt05 07/03/2020 12:45PM

I’m certainly not a lawyer, much less a judge, but that -- SixerHoo 07/03/2020 12:53PM

She’s saying she didn’t find out until the 2018 NYT tax fraud article -- WahooMatt05 07/03/2020 1:06PM

I’m certainly not a lawyer, much less a judge, but that

Insert a Link