Well that’s exactly her argument. She should’ve been paid ten times more

But the fraud deceived her. She would’ve held out for more if she knew how valuable they were. That fraud would then void the contract.

So she’s saying if she was paid $5X back then, she wouldn’t have written the book because it would’ve been a fair contract.

In response to this post by SixerHoo

Posted: 07/03/2020 at 12:45PM

Mary Trump accuses her family of committing fraud against her -- WahooMatt05 07/03/2020 12:06PM

Not sure why she would not have signed if she knew the assets -- SixerHoo 07/03/2020 12:30PM

She was paid $X to not talk based on Trump claiming only $40M in assets -- WahooMatt05 07/03/2020 12:36PM

Yeah, that’s what I’m reading too. But if she signed the agreement for $X, -- SixerHoo 07/03/2020 12:41PM

Its probably a fraudulent inducement claim, but may also depend upon -- Plano Hoo 07/03/2020 1:03PM

She was given a fixed amount of money, not participation in family wealth -- RickPerry 07/03/2020 12:49PM

Well that’s exactly her argument. She should’ve been paid ten times more -- WahooMatt05 07/03/2020 12:45PM

I’m certainly not a lawyer, much less a judge, but that -- SixerHoo 07/03/2020 12:53PM

She’s saying she didn’t find out until the 2018 NYT tax fraud article -- WahooMatt05 07/03/2020 1:06PM

Well that’s exactly her argument. She should’ve been paid ten times more

Insert a Link