and limit it to just the first one. The article states businesses paid $91B less on their 2018 returns. The link you claim you read, and you claim the article is based on (in order to substantiate your silly fiscal year pretzel, and to try and discredit the findings I was pointing out to you) puts those gross receipts for FY18 vs FY17 at being $76B less (I even pointed you to the page so you wouldn't have to actually read the link you claim to have read). How exactly do you explain that discrepancy while still sticking to your FY pretzel?

Here's a hint. If you indeed look at fiscal years, it would make sense that the drop would be less if you include 3 mos at the older 35% rate structure, by, oh, I don't know, maybe $15B or so. The article didn't use that $76B figure, they used $91B.