It is well established that Corporations have the protections of

Constitutional Rights, to believe otherwise is to believe that the government can dictate editorial policy to the New York Times Inc. or seize the property of a corporation with out compensation etc.

In response to this post by MaizeAndBlueWahoo

Posted: 01/18/2017 at 09:19AM

Trump met with Judge William Pryor on Saturday. ** -- JMHoo 01/17/2017 9:50PM

A bunch of Acela corridor elites wish he had met with Richard Pryor ** -- Tuckahokie 01/18/2017 06:58AM

Since Nancy Reagan used astrologers, it's OK for him to use mediums. ** -- HowieT3 01/18/2017 09:45AM

+1 LOL ** -- Tuckahokie 01/18/2017 09:49AM

He would Balkanize civil rights laws. I don't know, but I'm guessing he -- Seattle .Hoo 01/17/2017 11:07PM

I don't see why they shouldn't -- MaizeAndBlueWahoo 01/18/2017 08:50AM

It is well established that Corporations have the protections of -- AlexHoo 01/18/2017 09:19AM

No Alex, the press is specifically mentioned in the 1A. You guys probably -- Seattle .Hoo 01/18/2017 09:53AM

Yes, money is speech -- MaizeAndBlueWahoo 01/19/2017 09:58AM

So you think that a corportion's property is subject to seizure -- AlexHoo 01/18/2017 1:15PM

It is well established that Corporations have the protections of

Insert a Link