There seemed to be a pretty big difference in depth of information and

degree of factual information. vs vague general claim.

also--any difference in the degree of aggressiveness in the questioning? I sure thought so, but it may have been my lefty bias showing through.

In response to this post by 111Balz

Posted: 09/08/2016 at 10:19AM

Clinton with some serious missteps -- TomKazanski 09/07/2016 10:43PM

Actually I thought her breadth and depth of expertise was pretty -- 111Balz 09/08/2016 08:45AM

There seemed to be a pretty big difference in depth of information and -- southdenverhoo 09/08/2016 10:19AM

Matt seemed to go after Hillary early, not sure if -- 111Balz 09/08/2016 10:23AM

Dems are screaming foul for sure on Lauer. Alt-Right media! :-) -- jdubforwahoowa 09/08/2016 11:45AM

Well, she was wired for sound so lots of info at her earbud ** -- TpkeHoo 09/08/2016 08:51AM

LOL. Trump had an earpiece. -- Toolie92 09/08/2016 09:11AM

She was fluent. By the way, did the donald have another hairpin -- 111Balz 09/08/2016 09:08AM

You should take a look into those hairclips. I hear they've come a long way -- TpkeHoo 09/08/2016 09:20AM

Of course, that's not what she said. -- DanTheFan 09/08/2016 12:15AM

Yes, but it was pretty inartfully worded, and therefore risky given the... -- EAPo 09/08/2016 02:37AM

There seemed to be a pretty big difference in depth of information and

Insert a Link