He's forfeited any standing to question constitutionality of BO's actions. ** -- SixerHoo 02/24/2016 08:59AMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
He's forfeited any standing to question constitutionality of BO's actions. ** -- SixerHoo 02/24/2016 08:59AM Dereliction of duty isn't an impeachable offense ** -- WaxHoo 02/23/2016 9:08PM Of course, just a rant at all the Impeach Obama for Obamacare or whatever -- 81_Hokie 02/24/2016 07:45AM Nope...you get a nice ceremony in The Rose Garden instead. ** -- Tuckahokie 02/24/2016 06:56AM That's different ** -- FfxStationHokie 02/23/2016 8:23PM It's a game. I think now McConnell and others are beating this drum to try -- Seattle .Hoo 02/23/2016 7:25PM How is that really different than Harry Reid not letting countless bills -- Hoodafan 02/23/2016 7:23PM Its the Supreme Court; it's not another defund ACA bill -- 111Balz 02/23/2016 9:32PM THe political price to be paid -- Wahoo Ron 02/23/2016 9:02PM Yeah. Screw the national interest. Party first. -- WaxHoo 02/23/2016 9:19PM Maybe the party's interest and the national interest coincide on this -- Wahoo Ron 02/23/2016 9:31PM How is a gridlocked SCOTUS in the nation's best interest? ** -- SixerHoo 02/24/2016 09:04AM No hearing, no vote, no consideration. ** -- ryno hoo 02/23/2016 7:00PM So you are demanding that Obama be impeached? ** -- Wahoo Ron 02/23/2016 6:59PM No. why do you ask? ** -- 111Balz 02/23/2016 9:33PM So you post under two usernames? 81_Hokie AND 111Balz? ** -- Wahoo Ron 02/23/2016 9:36PM DAMN. yes, great detective work Ron. ** -- 111Balz 02/23/2016 9:40PM