The Soapbox

ryno hoo

Joined: 01/03/2005 Posts: 14449
Likes: 21980


I will leave you in the small percentage that could fit the category


for now but, all in all, it's a high percentage that do no fit in the category, even though they say so. It is to make themselves feel better. Several posters in the thread repeatedly claim to be fiscally conservative. The socially liberal and fiscally conservative position would be that you can be socially liberal by being pro-abortion and not have it be illegal. But the fiscally conservative position would be that you would never have higher government spending to fund it, particularly taxing people to do so against their will. However, as is often the case, the endgame position is just to be socially liberal with the other part left off.

I think you've exposed their pretzel logic (i.e., absence of logic) quite well with the 97%/3% b.s. they try to use.




(In response to this post by Hoodafan)

Posted: 02/22/2016 at 1:02PM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Well, Kasich. So much for moderate republicans. -- HoosWillWin 02/22/2016 09:13AM
  Go batshit or go home. ** -- WahooRQ 02/22/2016 11:23AM
  Crap -- NJHoo 02/22/2016 10:44AM
  Crap -- NJHoo 02/22/2016 10:44AM
  I liked him too. But I also support PP. ** -- HoosWillWin 02/22/2016 10:51AM
  And they don't! ** -- 111Balz 02/22/2016 11:02AM
  I googled this for you -- NJHoo 02/22/2016 10:53AM
  How are those investigations going, by the way ** -- cvilleHOOrat 02/22/2016 09:31AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307