Based only on that article I think it's impossible to say. Hankey
approached "Trump's camp"... is that a lawyer on the case or a financial person? Or Trump?
If the lawyer doesn't know or have reason to believe something was in the works then there is no violation. I read some of the ABA rule and it's a bit murky but my reading is that if the lawyer comes to know that something he filed is false then he is required to correct it. I don't think the fact that Hankey is not a professional bonding agent has anything to do with anything. He made his fortune in subprime loans. He is a credible creditor. If I emailed Trump and said I would lend him a half billion dollars that wouldn't be credible and there would be no duty to inform but Hankey is a completely different story and I don't see why a lawyer knowing of this would not be required to correct his previous representations.
|
(
In response to this post by southdenverhoo)
Link: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_3_3_candor_toward_the_tribunal/comment_on_rule_3_3/
Posted: 04/06/2024 at 1:01PM