Having only one below avg category v 2 above makes it look worse - more red ** -- Sabremetrician 03/02/2024 10:23AMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
Having only one below avg category v 2 above makes it look worse - more red ** -- Sabremetrician 03/02/2024 10:23AM The destruction is intentional -- Hoodeac 03/02/2024 09:42AM Wow...several of the Deploristan member-states recvd. Good to Avg ** -- Tuckahokie 03/02/2024 07:59AM I may concede your point on Alabama, but for MT, SD, WY -- Late 80s Hokie 03/02/2024 09:43AM You seem really surprised by that. I guess you assumed that they would all -- 111Balz 03/02/2024 08:46AM Mildly surprised...since it does counter a prevalent narrative ** -- Tuckahokie 03/02/2024 08:53AM Alabama the gold standard! Hoo knew? -- Hoodafan 03/02/2024 09:08AM How is having a congressional delegation that mirrors the state population -- SixerHoo 03/02/2024 09:44AM It's so racist and backwards they don't even need to Gerrymander :>) ** -- Tuckahokie 03/02/2024 09:12AM Does it? Did you see all the red? The South? ** -- 111Balz 03/02/2024 08:58AM And among blues states IL and OR aren’t good ** -- SixerHoo 03/02/2024 08:03AM How is North Dakota data incomplete? The entire State is one district ** -- Tuckahokie 03/02/2024 08:29AM I guess the mappers just punted since you can neither gerrymander a state -- SixerHoo 03/02/2024 08:46AM Isn't green WY only one district too? ** -- Hoodafan 03/02/2024 09:17AM It is. Strange. ** -- SixerHoo 03/02/2024 09:45AM