Your willful ignorance doesn’t give you a pass. The financing was provided against the advice of the fund advisors where the money came from. In other words, those advisors thought the deal had too much risk, that it was a bad deal. Their objections included: “the inexperience of the Affinity Fund’s management”; the possibility that the kingdom would be responsible for “the bulk of the investment and risk”; due diligence on the fledgling firm’s operations that found them “unsatisfactory in all aspects”; a proposed asset management fee that “seems excessive”; and “public relations risks” from Mr. Kushner’s prior role as a senior adviser to his father-in-law, according to minutes of the advisory panel’s meeting in June of 2021. But Jared’s buddy MBS overruled the advisors.

That’s your “legitimate business.” And why do you ignore the possibility that Jared provided some quid quo pro to MBS while he was still in the WH? Why was MBS willing to take the financial risk of losing that much money against the advice of his experts? You are going to believe whatever you want to believe because facts don’t matter to you but your opinions have no credibility here when you ignore the facts.

As for Joe Biden being on the take, how’s Comer’s “investigation” going?

[Post edited by SixerHoo at 01/28/2024 09:15AM]