How many times have I asked you about the Epstein List?
You were pounding the table for years ... then poof ... gone like a fart in the wind. What happened?
Spare us your victimhood about "open discourse." An open rational discourse goes both ways. You can't have an "open discourse" if it's not based on facts and truths. There needs to be some personal accountability. The second Trump appeared on the "Epstein List," you immediately made excuses and didn't want to talk about it because it didn't push your narrative.
How about JMHoo? That poster pounds the table about Ron DeSantis for years and then poof ... suddenly he's a huge supporter of "idiot asshole" again. Not a word why he dumped Ron DeSantis.
How about LAHoo, Hooda, resist, and ryno? Their arguments are not based on truths or facts. How does anyone have an "open discourse" with that?
I'm all for open discourse. I'm all for the likes of CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, WaPo, Brietbart, etc. representing both sides of the debate. However, when one sides argument isn't based on facts and truths ... and shows no accountability ... how can there be any "open discourse?" Case in point: Fox News. They purposely lied about the 2020 election which cost them $787mn and possibly more. You know what Fox News said? They said the settlement shows some warped sense of journalistic integrity. That's what we're dealing with.
|
(
In response to this post by HokieDan95)
Posted: 01/24/2024 at 08:48AM