Again, lolz. Neither SDH nor anyone else needs to...
...explain how evidence works. Everyone knows how evidence works. What SDH failed to do, by the way, was explain how he, as an attorney, could possibly defend a client who found themselves facing a trial like Trump's. You're attorney, so same question to you.
If I claim that I told my best friend that you touched me inappropriately at some unknown time decades ago, and she agrees, then that's "evidence" that you touched me inappropriately. Of course, I can't prove that you and I ever met in the location where I claim the touching occurred, I can't specify any date, I never filed any police or other report contemporaneous with the assault, no one heard the assault despite it being in a very public place, no one can remember me being there despite me being one of the most recognizable celebrities on Earth, etc.
The problem for you, though, is that I've got my case in front of a judge and jury who hate you personally and have a vested, personal interest in seeing you harmed, so you're fucked. You won't be allowed a defense, nor could you even defend yourself as there are no specific allegations being made that you could even attempt to disprove. The friendly judge and jury are just going to side with me, and you'll be paying me $10M for my pain and suffering (also unproven) over you calling me a liar about my allegation.
Welcome to justice in today's TDS banana republic.
[Post edited by Los Angeles Hoo at 01/23/2024 5:43PM]
|
(
In response to this post by Plano Hoo)
Posted: 01/23/2024 at 5:25PM