The Soapbox

Los Angeles Hoo

Joined: 03/05/2014 Posts: 19807
Likes: 30504


Those are explicit requirements about which there is no doubt regarding....


...one's qualification. They are black and white.

That's in sharp contrast to the "insurrection" argument being made where 1) there was no insurrection, 2) no one has been charged with, much less convicted of, insurrection, 3) the candidate in question had nothing to do with the alleged events in any case and 4), even if all of the above facts weren't in evidence, the article in question doesn't even apply to the presidency.

A Secretary of State in Maine or a court in Denver can't subvert a federal election of the nation's chief executive by simply declaring the leading candidate is ineligible anymore than they can ban a 50 year-old because they deem them too young. Their fantasies don't supercede the Constitution or the law.

(In response to this post by Hoo TV)

Posted: 12/29/2023 at 12:26PM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
They want to end democracy! -- Hoodafan 12/29/2023 11:04AM
  Bipartisan House Committee Report -- DanTheFan 12/29/2023 1:16PM
  LOLZ, just spit out my drink when I saw this - too damn funny ** -- Capital City Hoo 12/29/2023 12:31PM
  When the looting starts, the shooting starts. ** -- Capital City Hoo 12/29/2023 12:32PM
  Just orderly tourists who had to shit real bad ** -- Hoo TV 12/29/2023 12:06PM
  Democracy at work! -- DanTheFan 12/29/2023 11:10AM
  The USSC would be perfectly consistent in tossing out... -- Los Angeles Hoo 12/29/2023 11:24AM
  The Supreme Court will decide this. -- WahooMatt05 12/29/2023 11:08AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307