Conspiracy theorist by giving you a major gotcha moment? Does “you” mean RQ? Exactly which dem admirer of Clinton could have been expected to know about his various relationships? Your answer of course will be publicly available information/pics showing him with Epstein. So, yeah, dems ignored that, clearly knowing the full extent of Epstein’s crimes, all the way back in the ‘90s, and repubs had no choice but to launch pizzagate and similar baseless creepy fantasies as a result.

That the same exact observation could be made about trump supporters is…I guess ignored in your brilliant analysis.

Clinton may have been a full participant in Epstein's sex trafficking for all I know, but then so could Trump have been, along with scores of other prominent figures. In the world before the repub party became its lunatic fringe, none of that would justify such broad generalizations about guilt by association. Which basically goes “all dems are guilty of the crimes we presume guilt upon some prominent dem caught up in a gotcha - never mind we can’t even substantiate the prominent dem’s involvement - we have photos of two people standing together - and that’s all we need. As long as they’re not repubs.”

No dems are responsible for the tinfoil hat you choose to wear. At least we could think of you as a reasonably honest tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist if you applied your conspiracy theories even when politically inconvenient. Given Epstein’s relationships across the entire spectrum, you should be a full time purveyor of pizzagates against the entire world. But you’re really just an opportunist who sees only what he wants. In other words, a card carrying cult devotee, like most of the rest of your party.
[Post edited by hoolstoptheheels at 11/24/2023 12:18PM]