The Soapbox

111Balz

Joined: 08/13/1998 Posts: 60038
Likes: 57630


He also said this” However, the justices have long insisted that they are


not compelled to follow the Code of Judicial Conduct.”
Then he doesn’t give one precedent example to support that statement, not one.
Instead he basically focuses on the same diversionary tactic that you clowns have been digging into, the wife’s behavior. The issue is about the Supreme Court justice not recusing himself. It’s fine to have a crazy wife, it’s even fine to have a wife who talks about overthrowing elections. But when there’s evidence she was conspiring with the White House to do so, then the justice can’t vote on a case about investigators gaining access to participants emails.

(In response to this post by JMHoo)

Posted: 03/27/2022 at 10:25AM



+5

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  This entire non-story was a timed leak by... -- Los Angeles Hoo 03/27/2022 11:31AM
  Liberals gave the black man a high tech lynching -- ryno hoo 03/27/2022 10:56AM
  IOKIADDI ** -- ResistHoo 03/27/2022 11:28AM
  Yep. (Pic) -- ryno hoo 03/27/2022 11:33AM
  The right can't meme ** -- Hoodeac 03/27/2022 12:40PM
  It would be ridiculous to impeach, but criticism -- BocaHoo91 03/27/2022 10:25AM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2781
vm307