It's really interesting, and I don't think conventional wisdom
applies. Sanders and Warren are correct imo Trump is a symptom of something deeper, though I don't like a lot of their proposed solutions or approach personally.
There's this pocket of key voters in key states who would potentially go for Sanders as a first choice and Trump second, or vice versa. I think "most likely to beat Trump" is obviously Biden's greatest asset in the primary ("only 23 percent of Democrats said he had the 'best policy ideas' in a recent poll by Quinnipiac University. But 56 percent of Democrats said he had the best chance of defeating Mr. Trump."), but in the general there are a lot of party switching voters who won't be particularly moved by an "anyone but Trump" message alone. That "up for grabs" contingent is not turned off by him enough (or maybe even like him on immigration, being a wrecking ball, etc) to be motivated that way.
At the same time, the margin was so narrow for Trump last time that maybe Biden, if he got there, wins just by virtue of not being Hillary, actually campaigning in WI-MI-PA, and/or getting a better turnout from voters that sat out last time. But Trump does have incumbency that he didn't before and a good economy.
[Post edited by hoodeyo at 05/04/2019 8:32PM]
|
(
In response to this post by DanTheFan)
Posted: 05/04/2019 at 4:36PM