One correction . It was the

Ad agency reimbursing him, probably to escape the eyes of the NRA's accountants.

The NRA here looks sloppy but they are the ones that seem to be the real loser.

The big story is the tawdry relationship between the principal vender and the NRA CEO.

In response to this post by BocaHoo91

Posted: 05/03/2019 at 11:37AM

$200,000 in suits. I really need to start a gun lobby non-profit. -- Shenhoo 05/03/2019 10:13AM

A lot of these non-profits exist primarily for the enrichment of -- BocaHoo91 05/03/2019 10:51AM

Not why they all exist but an all too tempting side game when you have the -- HokieDan95 05/03/2019 11:14AM

Yes, most likely formed with good intent, or for the specific purpose, -- Late 80s Hokie 05/03/2019 12:48PM

It's all a biased witch hunt. Hey, it worked for one crook ** -- 81_Hokie 05/03/2019 10:30AM

It really looks like a fairly classic kickback. Pierre ships quantities of -- Shenhoo 05/03/2019 10:35AM

There's no way he's recording the clothes as income. -- BocaHoo91 05/03/2019 11:12AM

I don't think he can write it off. -- Shenhoo 05/03/2019 11:20AM

On his personal return, I'm guessing he omits it entirely and -- BocaHoo91 05/03/2019 11:24AM

One correction . It was the -- Shenhoo 05/03/2019 11:37AM

One correction . It was the

Insert a Link